Show
Fiesta Econetic Fuel Consumption
#1
Posted 06 January 2011 - 06:40 PM
#2
Posted 07 January 2011 - 05:21 PM
Tell Ford Direct you are going to contact Watchdog, or Topgear, you never konw, it may chivvy them up a bit.
Good luck getting it sorted
#3
Posted 10 January 2011 - 11:02 AM
Thanks for that info - we'll let you know how we get on!!!Its a sad fact that quoted mpg in the brochure is never achievable in the real world. Having said that, only getting 50 is a bit low, and I guess that as the garage have had your car for so long now, they cant find anything amiss. If the car is new, I would expect the consumption to be down as the engine will still be tight, and it should go up as the car loosens up.
Tell Ford Direct you are going to contact Watchdog, or Topgear, you never konw, it may chivvy them up a bit.
Good luck getting it sorted
#4
Posted 26 January 2011 - 03:05 PM
I too have a Econetic which is now 10 months old and done nearly 20000 miles but like you the fuel consumption is nowhere near what is claimed for the vehicle. When I approached the dealer and complained they listened but weren't interested and suggested it too was my driving style. That annoyed me as on my previous 2 cars I regular and with ease achieved or slightly exceeded the claimed mpg so I know how to eek the most out of a car but not this one - impossible!. My best mpg is 64 but mostly 58-61 and when the claimed 76 mpg was the main reason for buying the car to say i am !Removed! off is an understatement especially with the attitude and service of the main dealer added in. I reackon this car has cost me around £330-410 in extra fuel this year (avg. price £1.10 per litre).
If you can let me know how you have got on recently as I would be interested to see if you have got closer to getting it resolved.
Jon
#5
Posted 26 January 2011 - 07:19 PM
But we to had problems with its mpg when new we could only avarage 48 mpg on a 55 litre tank, but after its first service at 12500 miles the mpg *massivly* increased to an avarge of 56-58 mpg on a tank. but bearing in mind the foucus has a more powerful engine, wieghs alot more than a fiesta and has 205 wide alloys.
i remeber our old car a 2009 59 mk7 fiesta 1.4 tdci would do 63-65 mpg on a full 45 lire tank of deisel.
So basicly get the car back! bear with the mpg till 12500 miles, get it serviced and the engine should be propally worn in then aswell and if thinggs dont improve then,
Get as much proof and facts dates and times etc, in writing as possible signed by ford and go to citezens advise
#6
Posted 17 February 2011 - 05:31 PM
“The CO2 emissions on Ford Fiesta ECOnetic and Ford Focus ECOnetic are under 100g/km making them exempt from road tax and both return over 74mpg.”
What a silly place to put an advert !
It summarised with the news that if I changed my bad driving habits I could save 8% on my fuel consumption. Well over 14 trips to the fuel pump it has turned in an average of 59.6mpg. 59.6mpg + 8% = 64.4mpg that’s not 74mpg is it FMC.
#7
Posted 17 February 2011 - 08:33 PM
Its a sad fact that quoted mpg in the brochure is never achievable in the real world.
Sorry, this isn't true at all.
In fact, it IS possible to do better than advertised. But then again, you have to find pleasure and satifsfaction in driving very very economical wich takes a big effort.
It is indeed a matter of driving style.

This is part of a listing with fuel consumption of a german driver (as example of very very economical driving).
3.25 liters / 100 km. = 87 MPG.
It takes off the fun of driving as we used to do but it is possible.
http://www.spritmoni...tic&powerunit=2
click on a car and you'll get the results from new till now.
Never say never.
#8
Posted 17 February 2011 - 09:56 PM
i and my dad (has a s max 2.0 tdci) notice diesels juicy when cold and on hills. has been coldest winter for ages so that could have a part to play. only real way to tell is take in a flat ish run keeping in rev range of max torque mine in 1750 ish as see what you get on the instant mpg read out once warmed up. i'd lay money on it being better then you getting and ford quoted are on rollers so dont simulate real world driving. don't know how many miles you done but tight engines may not loosen up till 10,000 plus miles especially diesels. Audi's used to have this problem
#9
Posted 01 March 2012 - 09:33 AM
Date MPG L/100km 09-Jan 60.80 4.65 14-Jan 61.95 4.56 23-Jan 59.24 4.77 30-Jan 57.76 4.89 05-Feb 57.32 4.93 11-Feb 54.57 5.18 13-Feb 60.77 4.65 15-Feb 63.05 4.48 18-Feb 56.76 4.98 25-Feb 59.83
4.72
I have about 25 mil to work so doing about 50 a day and 200 over the weekend... everything Extra Urban.
I took my ford to TC Harrison in Derby last weekend. They checked the ECU Software and did 10mil test and said that everything is ok with my car. I quoted the official MPG and said that over 70MPG was the main reason I bought the car. They said that there is nothing they can do.
The 54MPG - was when I had a real fun with my car... but on daily basis I'm doing close to 60MPG... most of the time doing approx 50Mil/h avg.
Fair to say - manufactures are taking !Removed!. Have anyone of you read about Urban (U) and Extra Urban (EU) consumption. Cutting to the chase during U test the car is doing 12mil/h on something like 5 mil run (from cold)... and EU, the car is doing in average 39mil/h on approx 7 mil run.
Anyone doing 39 on a Motorway... yeah thought so. In fact Manufacturers are making us (customers) look like idiots.
Anyone have any good tips on how to safe fuel?
PS: Previously I had 1.4 Petrol Titanium - and It did more that U stats and much less than EU.
PS: I know I can pay about £250 to get my ECU remapped which should increase Economy by 10% at best.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












