Jump to content


Turbos Vs Superchargers

  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 Steve



  • Admin
  • 4,964 posts
  • Ford Model: Kugy
  • Year: 2016
  • Location: Dorset

Posted 08 September 2011 - 03:09 PM

Turbos Vs Superchargers, in your opinion which is better? and why?

Have something to contribute?

Sign in or register to start a topic...

Sign up to FOC Premium Membership To Remove These Ads

#2 Danny87


    Feet Under The Table

  • New Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 429 posts
  • Name: Dan
  • Ford Model: Fiesta Freestyle 1.25 Zetec 5-door
  • Year: 2001
  • Location: Devon

Posted 09 September 2011 - 01:14 PM

Both are forced induction so do very much the same thing, but I think superchargers have an advantage in not needing to spin up, thus they are able to compress the air at lower RPM. A turbocharger has to spin up until it starts providing compressed air, from my understanding a supercharger is more efficient. This is probably because a supercharger is driven directly from the engine, where as a turbocharger is ran off the exhaust gasses.

I'm going to say supercharger because it sounds awesome and makes me think of American Muscle :D. In retrospect though, a turbocharged vehicle is probably cheaper on fuel if driven carefully, where as a supercharger is always running so it's more of a drag on the engine.

The sound of forced induction is awesome though, my father had a TDi Mitsubishi Colt previously (it was a Mercedes 3-cylinder) and with your windows down, on a quiet road speeding up to NSL, you could hear the turbo whine and it overpowered the clatter of the diesel engine, it was like 'whooooosh' and all of a sudden you'd feel a surge of power. Who said diesel's can't be fun to drive! I'd buy a modern TDi engine without any doubt.

Not what you're looking for?

Register now, we have a huge community of enthusiasts to answer any questions you might have

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users