Show
Many Insurance Policies To One Car
#1
Posted 15 December 2012 - 11:56 PM
Nothing bad will happen will it?
#2
Posted 16 December 2012 - 12:24 AM
Are you saying that you have a car which you have insured for you to drive, then there is a second policy with another Insurance company to insure someone else to drive the same car?
#3
Posted 16 December 2012 - 12:35 AM
Sorry, I don't quite follow.
Are you saying that you have a car which you have insured for you to drive, then there is a second policy with another Insurance company to insure someone else to drive the same car?
i have a policy with two cars on it, main driver on one, named driver on the other. There is another car that i am named on, and another person is the main driver. They are also a main driver with another insurance company
#4
Posted 16 December 2012 - 12:34 PM
#5
Posted 16 December 2012 - 01:18 PM
If both cars are in your name on the v5 then you must be the main driver on both,,, you could end up with 6 points on your licence if this isn't the case !!!
my focus is on the V5, the other car isnt
#6
Posted 16 December 2012 - 03:06 PM
i have a policy with two cars on it, main driver on one, named driver on the other. There is another car that i am named on, and another person is the main driver. They are also a main driver with another insurance company
That doesn't make sense.
To my understanding you can't have one insurance policy with two cars on it unless it's some kind of multicar policy, or a trade policy.
Can you clearly write again what you mean?
#7
Posted 16 December 2012 - 03:22 PM
then in a later post you say you have one policy with two cars on it... like a multicar policy...
#8
Posted 16 December 2012 - 03:23 PM
#9
Posted 16 December 2012 - 03:53 PM
#10
Posted 16 December 2012 - 07:41 PM
Perhaps if you could be more specific but without naming names (quoting Insurer A and B and driver X and Y), we could make some meaningful comments . As a general principle though you may not, as previously stated, insure the same 'risk' twice..
#11
Posted 16 December 2012 - 07:54 PM
If I came across this at the roadside I would certainly be making further enquiries.
#12
Posted 16 December 2012 - 08:29 PM
#13
Posted 16 December 2012 - 08:33 PM
A fraud called "fronting" occurs when a young person has a car in their own name, but the insurer is falsely told that a parent is the main driver.
Premiums are cut by hundreds of pounds but claims are rejected as the driver is told they are not properly insured.
The young drivers can also find themselves in court.
Some insurance firms are being criticised for not doing more to stop the fraud during online application processes.
Why do people 'front'?
Insurance can often cost a young driver who owns a car more than a thousand pounds a year, because they have not built up any no-claims bonus and they are seen as a far greater risk than older drivers.
But if a parent is put down as the main driver on the insurance policy, it can significantly lower the price.
Daniel, a student at a university in South West London, told Radio 4's Money Box how his mother "fronted" for him when he passed his test at the age of 17.
"It was quite expensive to be the main driver and to actually be insured as the first driver.
"I had to get my mum to put me on her insurance in order to make it more affordable.
Any act of deception to try to get a lower insurance premium... is tantamount to fraud
Adrian Webb, esure
"It saved about £500.
"Everything was registered in her name but the car did actually belong to me."
If an insurance company believes "fronting" has taken place, it can refuse to pay any claim.
The young driver can then be treated as driving without insurance and face a fine with six points penalty points on their licence.
Adrian Webb from the insurers esure, says parents and their children should resist the temptation to "front".
"The truth is, any act of deception to try to get a lower insurance premium with your insurance company is tantamount to fraud."
The insurers' remit
But critics question whether the insurers themselves are doing enough to discourage fronting or giving adequate warnings to people that they might be committing insurance fraud.
I believe it is the insurers' fault
Paul, Norwich
Do you agree or disagree? Have your say
During the online application process some, some firms - including esure, Churchill and the Post Office - allow a car owned by a young person to be insured by a parent who then puts their child down as an occasional driver.
Other companies insist that the owner of the car and the main driver must be the same on the insurance application, so there is less risk of "fronting".
The insurance industry itself will not reveal any figures on how many claims it is turning down, but the Financial Ombudsman Service says it is dealing with between 100 and 200 fronting disputes each year, and that indicates that firms will be dealing with around 1000 such cases annually.
Be warned
Peter Hinchcliffe, the lead insurance ombudsman, says in many cases customers have a difficult task to show they have not been "fronting".
"This is a question of the evidence, so if you are the parent and you have said you are the main driver and the car has been in an accident, or stolen, at your son or daughter's university, you have got a lot of work to do to explain how that has come about."
#14
Posted 16 December 2012 - 09:30 PM
#15
Posted 16 December 2012 - 09:58 PM
So are you saying that someone who has their own car and own insurance is not allowed to be a named driver on another policy full stop? Surely that can't be right? As ferretfloozy says this would mean any other car you drive would only be covered 3rd party and there would be no way of getting fully comp...Indeed, you can be insured on your own car but should not even be a named driver on another as fully comp would cover you third party on any other car anyway.
If I came across this at the roadside I would certainly be making further enquiries.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users






Contributor










Latest Comments
More