Jump to content


Show
Photo
- - - - -

2013 1.6 Powershift Mpg??


  • Please log in to reply
61 replies to this topic

#31 claus10

claus10

    Settling In Well

  • Budding Enthusiast
  • PipPipPip
  • 39 posts
  • Name: Claus
  • Ford Model: Fiesta
  • Year: 2013
  • Location: Other / Non-UK

Posted 30 July 2013 - 09:49 PM

Huh?

Have something to contribute?

Sign in or register to start a topic...

Sign up to FOC Premium Membership To Remove These Ads

#32 b1g_dav3

b1g_dav3

    Ford Enthusiast

  • Moderator
  • 2,497 posts
  • Name: David
  • Ford Model: Fiesta Zetec S TDCi
  • Year: 2013
  • Location: Lancashire
Contributor

Posted 30 July 2013 - 09:50 PM

Huh?

 

The V word, it's not to be mentioned on this forum! :P



#33 claus10

claus10

    Settling In Well

  • Budding Enthusiast
  • PipPipPip
  • 39 posts
  • Name: Claus
  • Ford Model: Fiesta
  • Year: 2013
  • Location: Other / Non-UK

Posted 30 July 2013 - 09:53 PM

Lol OK sorry :)

My point is just powershift is not som crappy V comparable gearbox. :)

#34 jimrex

jimrex

    Too much time on the boards

  • FOC Supporters
  • 556 posts
  • Name: James
  • Ford Model: 2011 Mk3 Focus, 2009 Mk7 Fiesta
  • Year: 2011
  • Location: Cambridgeshire

Posted 30 July 2013 - 09:59 PM

To get this back on topic, I'll give some friendly advice on the original queries raised...

 

Firstly, many people do refer to the quoted manufacturer economy figures and expect to achieve these in real world conditions. The catch here is that manufacturers create optimum conditions (constant ideal temperature, constant speed, distance etc) so that scientifically at least, they produce a fair test which is comparable across brands. Due to the controlled nature of these tests, many people will struggle to achieve these quoted figures.

 

With regards to your car, I don't think there are any issues with it, it just needs to be driven a bit more and properly bedded in so that all the components begin to work efficiently. Autos have traditionally been thirstier than their manual equivalents, but as technology develops, this has been seen less and less - I work in the industry and have experience with both Peugeot's EGC gearbox and VW group's DSG/S-tronic gearbox which are just as efficient (if not more) than their manual cousins - Powershift is Ford's version of this very same technology.

 

It's also worth mentioning that while the trip computer is a good indicator of your economy, it might be a good idea to calculate the MPG for a few fill ups and see how different your workings are from the car's read-out.

 

Hope that helps :)



#35 Traquare

Traquare

    Settling In Well

  • Members via FB
  • PipPipPip
  • 45 posts
  • Name: Tracey
  • Ford Model: Fiesta Titanium X Powershift EcoBoost
  • Year: 2014
  • Location: Yorkshire

Posted 31 July 2013 - 07:40 AM

To get this back on topic, I'll give some friendly advice on the original queries raised...

 

Firstly, many people do refer to the quoted manufacturer economy figures and expect to achieve these in real world conditions. The catch here is that manufacturers create optimum conditions (constant ideal temperature, constant speed, distance etc) so that scientifically at least, they produce a fair test which is comparable across brands. Due to the controlled nature of these tests, many people will struggle to achieve these quoted figures.

 

With regards to your car, I don't think there are any issues with it, it just needs to be driven a bit more and properly bedded in so that all the components begin to work efficiently. Autos have traditionally been thirstier than their manual equivalents, but as technology develops, this has been seen less and less - I work in the industry and have experience with both Peugeot's EGC gearbox and VW group's DSG/S-tronic gearbox which are just as efficient (if not more) than their manual cousins - Powershift is Ford's version of this very same technology.

 

It's also worth mentioning that while the trip computer is a good indicator of your economy, it might be a good idea to calculate the MPG for a few fill ups and see how different your workings are from the car's read-out.

 

Hope that helps :)

 

Hi thanks, that's really good to know! x



#36 Traquare

Traquare

    Settling In Well

  • Members via FB
  • PipPipPip
  • 45 posts
  • Name: Tracey
  • Ford Model: Fiesta Titanium X Powershift EcoBoost
  • Year: 2014
  • Location: Yorkshire

Posted 31 July 2013 - 07:43 AM

Just to point out, I've already done 600 miles in it, but is still only getting about 180 at the absolute most, on motorways, per a full tank of fuel... x



#37 DanGersFord

DanGersFord

    Dan The Gas Man

  • FOC Supporters
  • 3,498 posts
  • Name: Daniel
  • Ford Model: Fiesta ST3
  • Year: 2014
  • Location: Scotland
Contributor

Posted 31 July 2013 - 07:44 AM

Right enoughs enough now everyone please try to get on or we will have to remove the post altogether ive removed a couple of posts try and keep things friendly please

#38 Magenta

Magenta

    Serial Poster

  • Budding Enthusiast
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 462 posts
  • Name: Alan
  • Ford Model: Fiesta Mk7 Titanium 1.4 Auto - Marello
  • Year: 2009
  • Location: Worcestershire

Posted 31 July 2013 - 08:39 AM

To get this back on topic, I'll give some friendly advice on the original queries raised...

 

Firstly, many people do refer to the quoted manufacturer economy figures and expect to achieve these in real world conditions. The catch here is that manufacturers create optimum conditions (constant ideal temperature, constant speed, distance etc) so that scientifically at least, they produce a fair test which is comparable across brands. Due to the controlled nature of these tests, many people will struggle to achieve these quoted figures.

 

With regards to your car, I don't think there are any issues with it, it just needs to be driven a bit more and properly bedded in so that all the components begin to work efficiently. Autos have traditionally been thirstier than their manual equivalents, but as technology develops, this has been seen less and less - I work in the industry and have experience with both Peugeot's EGC gearbox and VW group's DSG/S-tronic gearbox which are just as efficient (if not more) than their manual cousins - Powershift is Ford's version of this very same technology.

 

It's also worth mentioning that while the trip computer is a good indicator of your economy, it might be a good idea to calculate the MPG for a few fill ups and see how different your workings are from the car's read-out.

 

Hope that helps :)

Some nice common sense advice and info - thanks James.  The only plus point of the "automated manual" box I experienced (won't mention the manufacturer again !) was that the actual mpg figures I achieved were as good as the manual manufacturer-quoted figures proving that auto technology can work economy-wise.

Some of us also choose an auto because we prefer them to drive, chaps.  Just as we are free to choose any other option to suit oiur tastes !



#39 Stewie316

Stewie316

    Feet Under The Table

  • Budding Enthusiast
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 152 posts
  • Name: Kyle
  • Ford Model: Ford Fiesta Titanium 1.4 - Hot Magenta
  • Year: 2010
  • Location: Devon

Posted 01 August 2013 - 11:30 PM

Just to point out, I've already done 600 miles in it, but is still only getting about 180 at the absolute most, on motorways, per a full tank of fuel... x

 

Tracy, i would book this into Ford if you're still not comfortable with the MPG figure.  Remember these are always estimated and take awhile to become more realistic.  Being it is a new car they can take up to 4000 miles before they finally settle down and get comfy.

 

i would expect 240 miles at minimum highway driving.  I get 376miles in a 1.4 but it took forever to get there.

 

let us know the outcome!. :)



#40 ShotgunN

ShotgunN

    Newbie

  • Members via FB
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Name: Pete
  • Ford Model: Fiesta Titanium X
  • Year: 2014
  • Location: Cheshire

Posted 02 August 2013 - 08:46 AM

Getting my Titanium X 1.6 Powershift next friday, but for the last 3 years have had a VW Polo with the 1.4 DSG and was very impressed with the smooth gear changes.

The wife always drove the auto Fiesta`s for the last 7 years, changing to a newer one every 18 months or so.

Each time the automatic gear box on these didnt have the smoothness about them that I liked about the american cars I had driven, and even her 2013 Fiesta Zetech wasnt a patch on my Polo

So it came for upgrade time and I took the 2013 Fiesta 1.6 Powershift for a test drive and it was the finally piece an auto Fiesta needs, where as the Polo was a smooth ride with the gear changes, it was to be honest, boring to drive.

The fiesta is a fun little car, and have loved the new style since the 2008 update. Cant wait till next week now.



#41 Magenta

Magenta

    Serial Poster

  • Budding Enthusiast
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 462 posts
  • Name: Alan
  • Ford Model: Fiesta Mk7 Titanium 1.4 Auto - Marello
  • Year: 2009
  • Location: Worcestershire

Posted 02 August 2013 - 09:54 AM

Getting my Titanium X 1.6 Powershift next friday, but for the last 3 years have had a VW Polo with the 1.4 DSG and was very impressed with the smooth gear changes.

The wife always drove the auto Fiesta`s for the last 7 years, changing to a newer one every 18 months or so.

Each time the automatic gear box on these didnt have the smoothness about them that I liked about the american cars I had driven, and even her 2013 Fiesta Zetech wasnt a patch on my Polo

So it came for upgrade time and I took the 2013 Fiesta 1.6 Powershift for a test drive and it was the finally piece an auto Fiesta needs, where as the Polo was a smooth ride with the gear changes, it was to be honest, boring to drive.

The fiesta is a fun little car, and have loved the new style since the 2008 update. Cant wait till next week now.

That is exactly what I wanted to know, Pete, how good/smooth is the 'Powershift' to drive, as when I upgrade I will definately look at the Ford range (despite the sloppy service of my local  dealer).  I take it by "Final piece it needs" you mean it is good.

I have no complaints about the smoothness of my current auto Fiesta so if the Powershift is at least as good and maybe more economical, then I could well go for it.

The best auto I have driven is by far is the CVT that was fitted to MG Rover models.  Absolutely smooth, no hesitation on pulling away and economical too.  Manual override  through the ratios could be done as fast as you like - it couldn't be beaten.  It also changed down on descending hills to aid braking !



#42 ShotgunN

ShotgunN

    Newbie

  • Members via FB
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Name: Pete
  • Ford Model: Fiesta Titanium X
  • Year: 2014
  • Location: Cheshire

Posted 02 August 2013 - 10:10 AM

@Magenta  Yeah I felt on the test drive, the gear box being as smooth on my Polo was the last part to a fun to drive car.

I love driving the wifes Fiesta 1.4 auto, it just feels like a little dodgem car, but the response of the gear box let it down. And when the wife borrowed my car she felt the gear box was much better and smother, but the car itself felt boring for driving.

Just counting the days, and hoping I dont wake up on the cold morning and find she`s nicked it for the heated seats......



#43 jonnymagnum2000

jonnymagnum2000

    Member

  • Budding Enthusiast
  • PipPip
  • 16 posts
  • Name: john
  • Ford Model: ford fiesta
  • Year: 2013
  • Location: Lancashire

Posted 03 August 2013 - 07:11 AM

hi,all im picking up a new powershift fiesta today, trading in my vw polo dsg,i was getting about 380-400 miles out of a full tank, I hope the fiesta is not far off, I say new fiesta its a ex demo with 900 miles on the clock, white 5 door titanium with city pack.so hope fully will be run in, I am picking fiesta up from west Yorkshire, I live in Wigan which is about 45 miles away I will see what its like on the way back.



#44 Traquare

Traquare

    Settling In Well

  • Members via FB
  • PipPipPip
  • 45 posts
  • Name: Tracey
  • Ford Model: Fiesta Titanium X Powershift EcoBoost
  • Year: 2014
  • Location: Yorkshire

Posted 03 August 2013 - 07:18 AM

hi,all im picking up a new powershift fiesta today, trading in my vw polo dsg,i was getting about 380-400 miles out of a full tank, I hope the fiesta is not far off, I say new fiesta its a ex demo with 900 miles on the clock, white 5 door titanium with city pack.so hope fully will be run in, I am picking fiesta up from west Yorkshire, I live in Wigan which is about 45 miles away I will see what its like on the way back.

 

Nah you won't get anywhere near that! I've got nearly 1,000 miles on mine, and i'm lucky to get 200 miles from a tank. It's a 6 speed 4 cylinder 1.6 engine so it's very very thirsty! x



#45 tarcin

tarcin

    Newbie

  • New Member
  • Pip
  • 1 posts
  • Name: deniz
  • Ford Model: Fiesta
  • Year: 2013
  • Location: Other / Non-UK

Posted 03 August 2013 - 07:31 AM

I m getting 43mpg  (@2000 miles) and I would say that powershift is far better than the older transmission in terms of both driveability and fuel



Have something to contribute?

Sign in or register to start a topic...


Not what you're looking for?

Register now, we have a huge community of enthusiasts to answer any questions you might have



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users