Posted 14 August 2013 - 11:56 PM
Have something to contribute?
Sign in or register to start a topic...
Posted 15 August 2013 - 12:02 AM
Posted 15 August 2013 - 12:08 AM
Posted 15 August 2013 - 12:23 AM
Posted 15 August 2013 - 02:50 AM
its vosa that writes the adviseries, the tester just selects the ones they think apply.
Posted 15 August 2013 - 04:10 AM
The MOT is gradually becoming stricter every year to European standards, but UK motorists have the expense of having to do it every year instead of every 2 years like other parts of Europe
Posted 15 August 2013 - 04:24 AM
Right so everyone knows that metal rusts and does not take long before it gets spots of rust. they are pulling you for not excessive corrosion but corrosion on all parts under the car, and the bits that are plastic coated they are pulling you for that aswell, they are having a laugh mate, dont go back to them and go some where else.
Posted 15 August 2013 - 12:23 PM
Garages offer them to generate work, so anyone offering cut price mot is doing so in hope if increasing revenue, so should expect a few advisories.
End of the day, they have given you an honest mot, just taken advisories to extreme,,,not that uncommon really and morally questionable but perfectly legal
Posted 15 August 2013 - 01:41 PM
That list is extreme to the point of abusive, just say it was your car, well looked after and serviced and you got that Mot with them advisories, and you wanted to sell your car. you would have no chance of getting anywhere near market value, in fact a potential customer would want it for nearer scrap value, No its not honest, moral and last time i checked blackmail was illegal, Advisories are there to inform the owner at the time of test these were passable but this work needs doing to the car. that list No and as I said go somewhere else and pay full price and see what list you get.
Posted 15 August 2013 - 02:57 PM
On my old MK1 I had the same advisory two years in a row informing me my brake discs were worn and needed replacement within 6 months.
Went to a different garage for my next MOT and they stated that there was years of life left in them.
Definitely all about drumming up work.
Posted 15 August 2013 - 04:37 PM
No two ways about it, the garage were stretching those boundaries to the limit, but it's visa that write all the advisories, so that gives the tester the option to mark up corrosion on roll bars/springs etc.
Find me a roll bar/spring that doesn't have signs of corrosion..so you have to question visa policy far more than the garages.
Its a farce, but where vIda are concerned, that's normally the case anyway...
To hand over a test ticket with advisories is no big deal, I'd be more concerned if the garage was trying to verbally make out these advisories needed urgent attention...by sound of it they haven't, just hoping customer might give go ahead to do some if not all marked work.
As said, cheap mots are rarely worth the saving as any garage that offers them are invariably losing money in doing so, no business can afford to do that without trying to make that loss up somewhere...
Visa are gradually getting their act together, but things like this opens up the opportunities for abuse
Posted 16 August 2013 - 01:50 PM
MOTs are changing - a whole list of things that were previously not part of the MOT were introduced in Jan 2012, then Jan 2013, and then more recently -
But in many parts of Europe the test is every 2 years - this was supposed to be introduced into the UK test, but we still have the expense of putting uor car/s through the MOT every year, but the test is just about as tough as the EU 2-year test
Its to bring the UK in line with the EU - blame the eurocrats/ politicians
Much of it is not safety - related but very silly "jobsworth" B.S. - probably to force old cars (like mine) off the road
Previous to the 1960s there was no MOT - it was introduced to stop "death traps" of cars with bald tyres/ no brakes or holes in the floor etc driving on the road - now it has been twisted/ perverted into something else / to ridiculus levels
Its getting to the point where you will be unable to modify your car in any way and still have it pass an MOT
A car should not be a disposable item - it should last for years - if these people had their way they would have us all chucking our cars away after 3 years - think about the enviromental impact that would have!
Posted 16 August 2013 - 04:06 PM
I haven't got a problem with a test every year or that its getting stricter but what I do mind is some bureaucrat telling me what I can do or cant do to my car, I would never knowingly drive a dangerous car so for a EU representative so say we in Britain must do whatever and abide by whatever is a joke, Last time i checked I lived in a free country, or has this been changed by some EU bylaw or something.
Unfortunately what FOCA says is true, there aim is to stop all modifications to cars, if it was not built with it or replaced with OEM parts it will not pass a test, and the thing is its will not be that far in the future.
Posted 16 August 2013 - 05:45 PM
not sure where this idea of vosa looking to eliminate modfifications is coming from, cant think of anything in the test where this could be a problem.
i put a very nice, full custom car through an mot last month, passed with flying colours...this car was built from scratch but followed all relevent legislation.
vast majority of new legislation dont even apply to older cars, not seen anything creeping in that will change this.
in the future, as an example, i can see a day where if a DPF was fitted at factory, it must be seen to still be fitted and functional..if ever that happens, then chances are, going on vosa policy over history, it will only apply for cars from date legislation was introduced..end of the day, these DPFs are only fitted to comply with euro legislation that the government signed up to, nothing to do with vosa at all at the moment, but as removing the systems becomes more common, can see the government forcing vosa to take action.
as for bi annual mots, speaking [or should that be typing] as a mechanic, think thats insane...i could give a endless list of cars that are regularly and properly serviced, yet still suffer from dangerous faults in between, only need to experience the diabolical state of the roads to know what could happen...apply the bi annual to the owners that carry out bare minimal repairs/checks, which probably far outnumbers the owners that do it right, you end up with a lot of death traps on the roads...from experience of crash recovery, its normally the innocent that cops it..if anything, there is a case for 6mth tests instead of bi annual
Have something to contribute?
Sign in or register to start a topic...
Not what you're looking for?
Register now, we have a huge community of enthusiasts to answer any questions you might have
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users